On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Magnus Therning wrote: > >> Second, my own experience lead me to disable [haskell] repository > >> on my computers because some packages were out of date but where > >> picked before AUR ones by the aur helper I use. > > > > Hence the confusion around this issue. If Haskell AUR packages are > > indeed being deprecated then is [haskell] now more of a definitive > > source or is it *also* not well maintained? > > I'd say it's fairly well maintained. Well maybe my experience on this is not the latest. Last time I tried [haskell] was some months ago and I believe there was some changes in the arch-haskell team since. Anyway some of the old arch-haskell PKGBUILDs in the AUR have been adopted since the mass orphan and I think the situation will get better there as maintenance will be spread among more people. -- Cédric Girard