On 17/12/11 23:07, Ethan Schoonover wrote: > There was a recent Arch-Haskell thread about dumping most of AUR > Haskell packages: > http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/arch-haskell/2011-November/001744.html > > As an end user, I effectively ignore the official Arch Haskell > packages as they are so far out of date. I'm also now trying to > disregard most of the AUR since I came across that thread. Haskell is > starting to feel fragile on Arch. > > > What about moving *all* Haskell related packages to the Haskell Arch > repo? All the Haskell Platform stuff, alex, happy, etc. > > > Ethan Schoonover > Github/Freenode: altercation - Solarized: http://ethanschoonover.com/solarized > > > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 13:44, Ionut Biru <biru.ionut@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 12/17/2011 11:41 PM, Bernardo Barros wrote: >>> Haskell platform was released with the latest stable GHC (7.0.4 of course). >>> >>> Guys, what's happening with haskell support in Arch? >>> >>> Xmonad, and now GHC and lots of packages in the supported repos are >>> not keeping update with upstream. >> >> i vote for dropping xmonad and all packages to aur and let the community >> handle them. >> >> it seems we are not doing a great job at keeping them up to date. >> >> -- >> Ionuț Hi, What are the real troubling haskell packages? Only GHC, haskell-platform and XMonad? I'll speak with Vesa about XMonad, i might be able to adopt it. -- Jelle van der Waa
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
