On 18/12/11 09:53, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On 17/12/11 23:07, Ethan Schoonover wrote: >> There was a recent Arch-Haskell thread about dumping most of AUR >> Haskell packages: >> http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/arch-haskell/2011-November/001744.html >> >> As an end user, I effectively ignore the official Arch Haskell >> packages as they are so far out of date. I'm also now trying to >> disregard most of the AUR since I came across that thread. Haskell is >> starting to feel fragile on Arch. >> >> >> What about moving *all* Haskell related packages to the Haskell Arch >> repo? All the Haskell Platform stuff, alex, happy, etc. >> >> >> Ethan Schoonover >> Github/Freenode: altercation - Solarized: http://ethanschoonover.com/solarized >> >> >> >> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 13:44, Ionut Biru <biru.ionut@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 12/17/2011 11:41 PM, Bernardo Barros wrote: >>>> Haskell platform was released with the latest stable GHC (7.0.4 of course). >>>> >>>> Guys, what's happening with haskell support in Arch? >>>> >>>> Xmonad, and now GHC and lots of packages in the supported repos are >>>> not keeping update with upstream. >>> >>> i vote for dropping xmonad and all packages to aur and let the community >>> handle them. >>> >>> it seems we are not doing a great job at keeping them up to date. >>> >>> -- >>> Ionuț > Hi, > > > What are the real troubling haskell packages? Only GHC, haskell-platform > and XMonad? > > I'll speak with Vesa about XMonad, i might be able to adopt it. > Btw adopted xmonad,xmonad-contrib, these packages will be updated today. -- Jelle van der Waa
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
