On (11/01/11 16:01), Calvin Morrison wrote: -~> 2011/11/1 Ángel Velásquez <angvp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: -~> > 2011/11/1 Meyithi <mail@xxxxxxxxxxx>: -~> >> I don't code, can we please move all coding tools to a separate repo so I -~> >> don't have to sync it? -~> >> -~> >> thanks -~> > -~> > You're a troll, you have a separate repo for you add it it's called [troll]. -~> > -~> -~> Actually I think there is a valid point being made. If we created a -~> repo for [games] why not [browsers], [code], lets just get a repo for -~> everything! First of all, because this has already been done in openSuSE (a separete repo for texlive, for new KDE/gnome, for multimedia, etc...) -- not cool inho. Second, because compilers are needed for core system tasks, browsers are general purpose software, and so on. This is what [core/extra] are about. The point here is to separate apps not by purpose but overall quality. While you can argue all day long about creating (or not) a repo for security apps, games definitely fall into a [poor software] category which you can name [games], [communitty-extra] or whatever. -- Leonid Isaev GnuPG key ID: 164B5A6D Key fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE 775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D
Attachment:
pgpRK_lbrK3fw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
