Excerpts from Allan McRae's message of 2011-08-03 23:31:51 +0200: > On 04/08/11 00:17, Philipp Überbacher wrote: > > Excerpts from Auguste Pop's message of 2011-08-03 15:37:38 +0200: > >> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Philipp Überbacher > >> <hollunder@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Excerpts from Auguste Pop's message of 2011-08-03 15:12:21 +0200: > >>>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Mauro Santos<registo.mailling@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> On 03-08-2011 07:41, Hector Martinez-Seara wrote: > >>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>> I'm aware that recently there has been some changes in libreoffice > >>>>>> package. The problem is that yesterday I updated my system and > >>>>>> surprisingly only libreoffice-common was updated. By that I mean that > >>>>>> I mean that not base, writer, impress... were available after the > >>>>>> update, they dissapered. Moreover, if I make "pacman -S libreoffice" > >>>>>> only "libreoffice-common" is targeted and there is no traces of > >>>>>> libreoffice-calc, libreoffice-base, libreoffice-draw.... The thing > >>>>>> is that there seems to be a container called libreoffice which it is > >>>>>> suppose to contain all this basic packages but in my case only > >>>>>> installs "libreoffice-common". What I'm doing wrong? I hope it is not > >>>>>> expected that we install one by one the components we want. > >>>>>> Thanks in advance, > >>>>>> Hector > >>>>> > >>>>> My only (small) gripe is that libreoffice-gnome maybe should be called > >>>>> libreoffice-gtk. > >>>>> > >>>>> As a user of xfce I was slightly puzzled but the naming saying gnome as > >>>>> it sort of implies that it is specific to gnome, however the description > >>>>> clarifies that it applies to any gtk dependent DE. Maybe the naming > >>>>> should be general and the description should state gnome,xfce and > >>>>> anything else gtk dependent that is officially supported by arch. > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Mauro Santos > >>>>> > >>>> and libreoffice-kde4 should be libreoffice-qt. > >>> > >>> I'm not sure about this, it pulls in at least phonon, which is kde > >>> specific. > >>> > >>> > >> oh, i didn't install that. that was a blind guess. :-P > >> > >> best regards, > > > > I didn't go through with it either but I had a look at what it would > > pull. libreoffice-gnome pulls nothing on my system, no gconf, no other > > gnome dependencies. libreoffice-kde pulls phonon and a bunch of other > > kde dependencies. > > > > So I'd suggest: > > libreoffice-gnome -> libreoffice-gtk (version?) > > libreoffice-kde4 (leave it) > > > > It's not consistent but it reflects reality. > > > > I'm fairly sure these are just following upstream naming so I doubt they > will change. > > Allan It's not exactly easy to figure out what upstream uses in this case. The only hint I found so far is the gnome_list.txt in the PKGBUILD. I don't know whether the upstream name is very significant in this case.
