On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Philipp Überbacher <hollunder@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Excerpts from Auguste Pop's message of 2011-08-03 15:12:21 +0200: >> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Mauro Santos <registo.mailling@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On 03-08-2011 07:41, Hector Martinez-Seara wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm aware that recently there has been some changes in libreoffice >> >> package. The problem is that yesterday I updated my system and >> >> surprisingly only libreoffice-common was updated. By that I mean that >> >> I mean that not base, writer, impress... were available after the >> >> update, they dissapered. Moreover, if I make "pacman -S libreoffice" >> >> only "libreoffice-common" is targeted and there is no traces of >> >> libreoffice-calc, libreoffice-base, libreoffice-draw.... The thing >> >> is that there seems to be a container called libreoffice which it is >> >> suppose to contain all this basic packages but in my case only >> >> installs "libreoffice-common". What I'm doing wrong? I hope it is not >> >> expected that we install one by one the components we want. >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> Hector >> > >> > My only (small) gripe is that libreoffice-gnome maybe should be called >> > libreoffice-gtk. >> > >> > As a user of xfce I was slightly puzzled but the naming saying gnome as >> > it sort of implies that it is specific to gnome, however the description >> > clarifies that it applies to any gtk dependent DE. Maybe the naming >> > should be general and the description should state gnome,xfce and >> > anything else gtk dependent that is officially supported by arch. >> > >> > -- >> > Mauro Santos >> > >> and libreoffice-kde4 should be libreoffice-qt. > > I'm not sure about this, it pulls in at least phonon, which is kde > specific. > > oh, i didn't install that. that was a blind guess. :-P best regards,