Re: Installation of libreoffice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Mauro Santos <registo.mailling@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03-08-2011 07:41, Hector Martinez-Seara wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'm aware that recently there has been some changes in libreoffice
>> package. The problem is that yesterday I updated my system and
>> surprisingly only libreoffice-common was updated. By that I mean that
>> I mean that not base, writer, impress... were available after the
>> update, they dissapered. Moreover, if I make "pacman -S libreoffice"
>> only  "libreoffice-common" is targeted and there is no traces of
>> libreoffice-calc,  libreoffice-base,  libreoffice-draw.... The thing
>> is that there seems to be a container called libreoffice which it is
>> suppose to contain all this basic packages but in my case only
>> installs "libreoffice-common". What I'm doing wrong? I hope it is not
>> expected that we install one by one the components we want.
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Hector
>
> My only (small) gripe is that libreoffice-gnome maybe should be called
> libreoffice-gtk.
>
> As a user of xfce I was slightly puzzled but the naming saying gnome as
> it sort of implies that it is specific to gnome, however the description
> clarifies that it applies to any gtk dependent DE. Maybe the naming
> should be general and the description should state gnome,xfce and
> anything else gtk dependent that is officially supported by arch.
>
> --
> Mauro Santos
>
and libreoffice-kde4 should be libreoffice-qt.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux