On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Seblu <seblu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Andreas Radke <a.radke@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Am Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:01:44 +0800 >> schrieb Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk@xxxxxxxxx>: >> >>> > error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) >>> > redland: /usr/lib/librdf.so.0 exists in filesystem >>> > redland: /usr/lib/librdf.so.0.0.0 exists in filesystem >>> > Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. >>> > >>> > redland-1.0.13-1 >>> > redland-compat-1.0.12-3 >>> > >>> Should an upstream bug be filed? I'm pretty sure having the same >>> soname across different minor versions is a bug. I've already checked >>> the current librdf.org bug tracker, no such bug filed yet. >>> >> >> You should probably do this. You may want to ask in the irc >> channel before. I'm usually logged in there #redland. >> > Hello Andreas, > > A bug is already filled here : https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23919. > If you need more precision, I'm at your service. > > Regards, > I believe he was talking about an upstream bug. A bug at bugs.archlinux.org is for alerting Arch devs. Of course, Andreas is already replying to this thread, so he IS aware. @Andreas, I'll try to drop by the IRC channel soon. Its midnight here =).
