Re: [WAS:arch-dev-public] raptor/rasqal/redland .so rebuilds moved to testing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Andreas Radke <a.radke@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:01:44 +0800
> schrieb Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> > error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
>> > redland: /usr/lib/librdf.so.0 exists in filesystem
>> > redland: /usr/lib/librdf.so.0.0.0 exists in filesystem
>> > Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
>> >
>> > redland-1.0.13-1
>> > redland-compat-1.0.12-3
>> >
>> Should an upstream bug be filed? I'm pretty sure having the same
>> soname across different minor versions is a bug. I've already checked
>> the current librdf.org bug tracker, no such bug filed yet.
>>
>
> You should probably do this. You may want to ask in the irc
> channel before. I'm usually logged in there #redland.
>
Hello Andreas,

A bug is already filled here : https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23919.
If you need more precision, I'm at your service.

Regards,

-- 
Sébastien Luttringer
www.seblu.net


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux