On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 4:50 AM, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Ionut Biru <ibiru@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 04/24/2011 11:28 PM, Arthur Titeica wrote: >>> >>> On Sunday 24 April 2011 20:49:49 Andreas Radke wrote: >>>> >>>> All file conflicts should now be solved. Please test the new soprano >>>> pkg in testing and all the other redland/rasqal/raptor packages in >>>> testing. >>> >>> Sorry if missed out something but soprano 2.6.0-3 still requires redland- >>> compat. From your message I understand it should come with redland as >>> dependency so that libreoffice wouldn't complain... >>> >> >> you should do a pacman -Syu. now redland-compat doesn't conflict with >> redland anymore and can be installed along with it. > > error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) > redland: /usr/lib/librdf.so.0 exists in filesystem > redland: /usr/lib/librdf.so.0.0.0 exists in filesystem > Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. > > redland-1.0.13-1 > redland-compat-1.0.12-3 > Should an upstream bug be filed? I'm pretty sure having the same soname across different minor versions is a bug. I've already checked the current librdf.org bug tracker, no such bug filed yet.
