Re: Change Arch's default crond

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 04/22/2011 12:11 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
>> Ionut Biru wrote:
>>> On 04/21/2011 02:18 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
>>>> Am Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:48:04 +0200
>>>> schrieb Sven-Hendrik Haase<sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>
>>>>> I second this suggestion. cronie upstream isn't dead at all. cronie
>>>>> is a drop-in unlike fcron which was favored earlier.
>>>>
>>>> Is it such a drop-in like the new dcron when dcron upstream was adopted
>>>> by this Arch user?
>>>>
>>>> Better look at the features and the use cases (don't only think of some
>>>> 24/7 servers, but also think of the desktop users) and not at some small
>>>> differences in the crontab syntax. It's definitely not such a big work
>>>> to re-adjust a few crontab entries if this is necessary at all. And this
>>>> work has to be done only once and can probably be done with sed.
>>>>
>>>
>>> i think you are not understanding the process.
>>>
>>> if cronie is moved in core, it won't have a replaces=dcron. Only new
>>> installations will get cronie by default instead of dcron.
>>>
>>
>> How is that possible? Are you saying that the broken dcron will stay in
>> core and there will two packages for cron?
>> Otherwise i dont understand how it wont be replaced (for all users).
>>
>
>
> if this will happen, the steps are very simple
> 1) remove dcron from core
> 2) add cronie/fcron to core in base group and depending on the package, 
> it might have conflicts=dcron but not replaces
>
> this way the existent systems will still have a "working" cron and new 
> installations will have the new cron
>

Has that ever happened before?
That means the existing systems will have a package from base thats not
supported by the Arch developers.
But since its not replaced, it would make it an infinite part of Arch so
it should also be supported.
Plus, the 2010.05 ISOs will still (try to) install it, but it wont be
there, and there wont be an upgrade path either.
Anyway, first time i've heard about such a plan. It makes absolutely no
sense to me. I seriously doubt its gonna work. But good luck.

----
Greg


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux