Am Wed, 06 Apr 2011 22:24:45 -0500 schrieb "David C. Rankin" <drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Upstream stability makes sense. If redhat is behind cronie, then that > seems like the logical choice. Why is this logical? Is it the developer what makes a software good or is it the features and the stability? If Redhat's cronie has less features than fcron then fcron is the logical choice, of course. > Otherwise, we are bound to repeat this > discussion 12 months from now when fcron or dcron has problems that > are not being fixed. dcron has a lot of issues, while fcron works since years. There's no need to wait again 12 months. This discussion already takes more than a year. Heiko
