On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:32 AM, David C. Rankin < drankinatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/06/2011 10:34 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: > >> Upstream stability makes sense. If redhat is behind cronie, then that >>> > seems like the logical choice. >>> >> Why is this logical? Is it the developer what makes a software good or >> is it the features and the stability? If Redhat's cronie has less >> features than fcron then fcron is the logical choice, of course. >> > > You are correct. The long term stability was just my thought. Like I said > earlier in my message -- It doesn't matter to me which cron we have -- as > long as we have one that works :) I have no say in the matter, so I will, > of course, defer to whatever decision you guys reach. I just want to make > sure we have a cron by default :) So what's the status here? I pulled cronie into [community-testing] a couple of days ago and will probably merge it into [community] soon. So that's the one I vote. But regardless of which one we choose in my opinion the sooner we get rid of dcron the better. --Kaiting. -- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
