Re: base stuff

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 08/04/11 20:43, Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Jelle van der Waa<jelle@xxxxxxxx>  wrote:

And on a side note, I don't like archlinux forcing users to use SELinux
because users should have a choice to use any MAC software they want.
That's why AppArmor /Tomoyo are nicer solutions cause they don't require
recompiling of packages ->  increasing bugs/problems.


If we compile our packages with SELinux support, does that force users to
use SELinux? I was under the impression that these changes would be
completely benign on non-SELinux enabled systems. --Kaiting.


If we compile with SELinux support then the developers need to support using SELinux. I certainly will not be supporting it with any of my packages (which includes ~1/4 of the [core] repo...) and I have not heard any other developer suggesting they will support it.

In my opinion, SELinux would be better supported in a user provided repo. Work with the guy (whose name I can not remember...) who has done an awesome job getting this all done and into the AUR.

Allan


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux