On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 22:31 +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > Thomas S Hatch wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <grbzks@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > > >> I guess you mean http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.arch.general/32759 > > > > Thanks for the link, I did not want to bring up SELinux yet, because I will > > not be getting to it for a few months, but this will help a great deal! > > > > -Thomas S Hatch > > > > Glad i could help :) > > ---- > Greg SELinux would maybe bring extra security too archlinux, but what I don't see in this thread is how much harder / more bugs it would make for developers/TU's to package if you use SELinux. So in general what is the benefits / costs for SELinux? And on a side note, I don't like archlinux forcing users to use SELinux because users should have a choice to use any MAC software they want. That's why AppArmor /Tomoyo are nicer solutions cause they don't require recompiling of packages -> increasing bugs/problems. -- Jelle van der Waa
