Thomas S Hatch <thatch45@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <grbzks@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > >> Thomas S Hatch wrote: >> > >> > I am saving the "include SELINUX support in base for a latter date" >> > >> > my understanding though is that the stated position of Arch was "no >> > systemd" >> >> s/was/is/g >> >> That is also my understanding in regards to selinux. Although i am not >> familiar with "stated positions" about either. >> >> PS. Ntp is fine application that will keep your clock synchronised. >> It seems to be 5 days off. :) >> > > Yes the systemd topic keeps popping up, right now we don't know > if certain upstream changes are going to force Arch into using systemd or > not. I dont think such a topic keeps popping up. In fact I dont remember reading a discussion between Arch developers about it, ever. I could probably go on ranting about stuff thats been shoved down users mouths the last years for months but its futile and a waste of time. > As for adding SELinux support in base but keeping it turned off by default, > +1 Although this isnt a vote, mine was for no selinux at all, so its just 1. :)
