On 06/15/2010 10:09 PM, Christoffer Hirth wrote: > ti., 15.06.2010 kl. 16.04 -0500, skrev C Anthony Risinger: >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Ray Kohler <ataraxia937@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Gaurish Sharma >>> <contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> since 64bit plugin is out, what are the Alternatives for Users? >>> >>> - keep it and use Flashblock addon (firefox) >>> - use Gnash or other open-source version (not very useful) >>> - use 32-bit plugin with nspluginwrapper >>> - use 32-bit plugin with 32-bit browser >>> - give up Flash >>> - ignore the risk and just keep using it >>> >>> Any others I missed? >> >> i recently tried a new flash plugin that was completely OSS, that had >> declared itself beta. unfortunately the name of it escapes me at the >> moment. i couldn't get it working quite right but i didn't put a lot >> of time into it either. from around the net the consensus was it >> looked very promising as an Adobe replacement. >> >> C Anthony > > I believe it is the lightspark? > > It is in aur as "lightspark-git". > > It looks promising, however it crashed my machine without any warning and I had to reboot the machine the hard way. Just so you know and don't try it while doing anything important. -- Mauro Santos
