Re: [arch-dev-public] dropping flashplugin x86_64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Christoffer Hirth <lists@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ti., 15.06.2010 kl. 16.04 -0500, skrev C Anthony Risinger:
>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Ray Kohler <ataraxia937@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Gaurish Sharma
>> > <contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >> since 64bit plugin is out, what are the Alternatives for Users?
>> >
>> > - keep it and use Flashblock addon (firefox)
>> > - use Gnash or other open-source version (not very useful)
>> > - use 32-bit plugin with nspluginwrapper
>> > - use 32-bit plugin with 32-bit browser
>> > - give up Flash
>> > - ignore the risk and just keep using it
>> >
>> > Any others I missed?
>>
>> i recently tried a new flash plugin that was completely OSS, that had
>> declared itself beta.  unfortunately the name of it escapes me at the
>> moment.  i couldn't get it working quite right but i didn't put a lot
>> of time into it either.  from around the net the consensus was it
>> looked very promising as an Adobe replacement.
>>
>> C Anthony
>
> I believe it is the lightspark?
>
> It is in aur as "lightspark-git".

ah yep, i believe that was it.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux