On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Christoffer Hirth <lists@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ti., 15.06.2010 kl. 16.04 -0500, skrev C Anthony Risinger: >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Ray Kohler <ataraxia937@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Gaurish Sharma >> > <contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> since 64bit plugin is out, what are the Alternatives for Users? >> > >> > - keep it and use Flashblock addon (firefox) >> > - use Gnash or other open-source version (not very useful) >> > - use 32-bit plugin with nspluginwrapper >> > - use 32-bit plugin with 32-bit browser >> > - give up Flash >> > - ignore the risk and just keep using it >> > >> > Any others I missed? >> >> i recently tried a new flash plugin that was completely OSS, that had >> declared itself beta. unfortunately the name of it escapes me at the >> moment. i couldn't get it working quite right but i didn't put a lot >> of time into it either. from around the net the consensus was it >> looked very promising as an Adobe replacement. >> >> C Anthony > > I believe it is the lightspark? > > It is in aur as "lightspark-git". ah yep, i believe that was it.
