ti., 15.06.2010 kl. 16.04 -0500, skrev C Anthony Risinger: > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Ray Kohler <ataraxia937@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Gaurish Sharma > > <contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> since 64bit plugin is out, what are the Alternatives for Users? > > > > - keep it and use Flashblock addon (firefox) > > - use Gnash or other open-source version (not very useful) > > - use 32-bit plugin with nspluginwrapper > > - use 32-bit plugin with 32-bit browser > > - give up Flash > > - ignore the risk and just keep using it > > > > Any others I missed? > > i recently tried a new flash plugin that was completely OSS, that had > declared itself beta. unfortunately the name of it escapes me at the > moment. i couldn't get it working quite right but i didn't put a lot > of time into it either. from around the net the consensus was it > looked very promising as an Adobe replacement. > > C Anthony I believe it is the lightspark? It is in aur as "lightspark-git".
