On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr. <jeffrey.parke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > >> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr. >> <jeffrey.parke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan <lists@xxxxxxxxxx >> >wrote: >> > >> >> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Matthew Monaco <dgbaley27@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> wrote: >> >> > On 05/30/2010 10:53 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> In order to improve firefox's reponse time, I'm thinking of compiling >> >> >> firefox with gcc's -O3 and -march settings from the ABS. >> >> >> Any tips on that matter, about updates, etc. ? >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > Try firefox-pgo. You have to be careful with gcc options when >> compiling >> >> > firefox. The AUR's firefox-pgo sets up properly for you. >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> It seems firefox-pgo is for 64bit, but I am on 32bit. I had put up a >> >> thread about upgrading to 64bit, but many suggested that it would not >> >> improve the performance much :( >> >> Should I compile after upgrading ? >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Nilesh Govindarajan >> >> Facebook: nilesh.gr >> >> Twitter: nileshgr >> >> Website: www.itech7.com >> >> >> > >> > it should be for both 32 and 64 bit >> > >> >> >> Hmm, I think so, the compilation should fail if not :) >> What's about firefox-qt ? Is it worth installing it ? >> >> -- >> Nilesh Govindarajan >> Facebook: nilesh.gr >> Twitter: nileshgr >> Website: www.itech7.com >> > > > that's a firefox port for the qt toolkit, as opposed to the regular gtk one. > I know that, but is it worth installing ? -- Nilesh Govindarajan Facebook: nilesh.gr Twitter: nileshgr Website: www.itech7.com
