On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr. <jeffrey.parke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > >> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Matthew Monaco <dgbaley27@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > On 05/30/2010 10:53 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> In order to improve firefox's reponse time, I'm thinking of compiling >> >> firefox with gcc's -O3 and -march settings from the ABS. >> >> Any tips on that matter, about updates, etc. ? >> >> >> > >> > Try firefox-pgo. You have to be careful with gcc options when compiling >> > firefox. The AUR's firefox-pgo sets up properly for you. >> > >> >> >> It seems firefox-pgo is for 64bit, but I am on 32bit. I had put up a >> thread about upgrading to 64bit, but many suggested that it would not >> improve the performance much :( >> Should I compile after upgrading ? >> >> -- >> Nilesh Govindarajan >> Facebook: nilesh.gr >> Twitter: nileshgr >> Website: www.itech7.com >> > > it should be for both 32 and 64 bit > Hmm, I think so, the compilation should fail if not :) What's about firefox-qt ? Is it worth installing it ? -- Nilesh Govindarajan Facebook: nilesh.gr Twitter: nileshgr Website: www.itech7.com
