On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr. > <jeffrey.parke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan <lists@xxxxxxxxxx > >wrote: > > > >> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Matthew Monaco <dgbaley27@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> wrote: > >> > On 05/30/2010 10:53 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> In order to improve firefox's reponse time, I'm thinking of compiling > >> >> firefox with gcc's -O3 and -march settings from the ABS. > >> >> Any tips on that matter, about updates, etc. ? > >> >> > >> > > >> > Try firefox-pgo. You have to be careful with gcc options when > compiling > >> > firefox. The AUR's firefox-pgo sets up properly for you. > >> > > >> > >> > >> It seems firefox-pgo is for 64bit, but I am on 32bit. I had put up a > >> thread about upgrading to 64bit, but many suggested that it would not > >> improve the performance much :( > >> Should I compile after upgrading ? > >> > >> -- > >> Nilesh Govindarajan > >> Facebook: nilesh.gr > >> Twitter: nileshgr > >> Website: www.itech7.com > >> > > > > it should be for both 32 and 64 bit > > > > > Hmm, I think so, the compilation should fail if not :) > What's about firefox-qt ? Is it worth installing it ? > > -- > Nilesh Govindarajan > Facebook: nilesh.gr > Twitter: nileshgr > Website: www.itech7.com > that's a firefox port for the qt toolkit, as opposed to the regular gtk one.
