Re: Bad attitude in flyspray again!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Dan McGee wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Damjan Georgievski <gdamjan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Commenting on closed bugs is not doable in Flyspray.

Actually it is doable, it's a configuration option per project.
Check http://bugs.archlinux.org/pm/proj1/prefs

More-over, I think it is a bad idea. The only reason people want
commenting on closed bugs is so that they can argue with the
developers

assuming malicious users up-front?

- give reasons why the bug shouldn't be closed. That's what
a reopen request is for. If that fails, then it's time to discuss it
directly with the developer in question

I see at least several good uses of allowing comments on closed bugs,
sometimes even adding aditional reasons why the bug needs to *stay
closed*.

Thanks. I just turned this on for the pacman bug tracker because I do
find comments after closing a feature that is a net positive (with
some trolling drawbacks, of course).

Me thanks! I think it will generally be positive. And in any case you can turn it back off if it's abused.


Dimitris



-Dan



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux