On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Loui Chang <louipc.ist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri 12 Mar 2010 13:28 -0600, Dan McGee wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Heiko Baums <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > But just closing a bug should not be done. There's usually a reason why >> > a bug is reported even if it's invalid. >> >> Seriously, present some examples here, this talking in the abstract is >> stupid. We're all grown ups, no one is going to have their feelings >> hurt. Without them I'm sick of the back and forth on this- most devs >> leave bugs open for more than long enough to get feedback (and don't >> get it!), and we would all rather have bugs be either fixed or closed >> than hang around forever. > > I think another problem is that the bug wranglers aren't necessarily > involved in development and don't communicate with the developers before > taking action on a bug. That's no fault of the developer, but is a fault > with the bug wrangler. Err? This sounds like quite a broad generalization without specific examples. Do *you* have any examples you'd like to share?
