Allan McRae wrote: > Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: >> Allan McRae wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have created a list of packages the could use a rebuild but for >>> which there is no hurry. These include packages without the arch in >>> their filename, packages containing a .FILELIST file, packages with >>> man pages in /usr/man or uncompress man and info pages. See >>> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Allan/Unimportant_Rebuild_List >>> >>> Do people think this is useful and should I move it to the >>> DeveloperWiki? >>> >>> Allan >>> >>> >> Good job. >> >> And for "Packages that can be converted to arch=any" sometime ago I >> sended a list of tentative packages [#1]. Its old and some of listed >> packages [#2] are now "any" >> >> >> [#1] >> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-July/005960.html >> [#2] http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/misc/any.txt >> > > I'm being lazy... any change you can easily generate an updated list > for [core]/[extra]? Don't worry about it if it will be a hassle. > > Allan > > > No problem, I can do a "light scan" making a difference between this list and list of current packages. I guess that doing again a "deep scan" don't make much sense, Good Luck! -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D
