Allan McRae wrote: > Hi, > > I have created a list of packages the could use a rebuild but for > which there is no hurry. These include packages without the arch in > their filename, packages containing a .FILELIST file, packages with > man pages in /usr/man or uncompress man and info pages. See > http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Allan/Unimportant_Rebuild_List > > Do people think this is useful and should I move it to the DeveloperWiki? > > Allan > Good job. And for "Packages that can be converted to arch=any" sometime ago I sended a list of tentative packages [#1]. Its old and some of listed packages [#2] are now "any" [#1] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-July/005960.html [#2] http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/misc/any.txt -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D
