Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
Allan McRae wrote:
Hi,
I have created a list of packages the could use a rebuild but for
which there is no hurry. These include packages without the arch in
their filename, packages containing a .FILELIST file, packages with
man pages in /usr/man or uncompress man and info pages. See
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Allan/Unimportant_Rebuild_List
Do people think this is useful and should I move it to the DeveloperWiki?
Allan
Good job.
And for "Packages that can be converted to arch=any" sometime ago I
sended a list of tentative packages [#1]. Its old and some of listed
packages [#2] are now "any"
[#1]
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-July/005960.html
[#2] http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/misc/any.txt
I'm being lazy... any change you can easily generate an updated list
for [core]/[extra]? Don't worry about it if it will be a hassle.
Allan
