On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Firmicus <Firmicus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Stefan Husmann a écrit : >> Aaron Griffin schrieb: >>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Firmicus <Firmicus@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> I don't know about the texlive-*-doc packages from community, which are >>>> maintained by Stefan Hussman. Feel free to ask him directly or to >>>> file a >>>> bug report. >>>> <snip> >>> >>> It's also possible that the -doc packages are farther behind, and >>> sources have been removed for those simply because they're not up to >>> speed with the official texlive packages >>> >> Hello, >> >> the -doc packages are far behind because I did not manage to build >> them correctly, i.e to download the doc packages in a similar way >> Firmicus does for the normal packages. I did not upload the zip-files >> to ftp.archlinux.org because I do not see a reason for doing so and >> the packages are quite big. No user probably wants >> to update a the packages that way or will be able to do so. >> Regards Stefan Husmann > > The reason for doing so is simple: the TeXLive license *requires* us to > provide the sources :) > > BTW if you have problems with my texlive-scripts, feel free to ask ;) Aren't the docs in the same source tarballs? Couldn't you just pull the existing texlive tarballs and use those?
