Aaron Griffin schrieb:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Firmicus <Firmicus@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Aaron Griffin a écrit :
2009/10/5 Sergej Pupykin <pupykin.s@xxxxxxxxx>:
Btw, if someone interested in, here is the list of packages which failed
last time:
<snip>
texlive-bibtexextra
texlive-bibtexextra-doc
texlive-core
texlive-core-doc
texlive-fontsextra-doc
texlive-formatsextra-doc
texlive-games-doc
texlive-genericextra-doc
texlive-htmlxml-doc
texlive-humanities-doc
texlive-langcjk-doc
texlive-langcyrillic-doc
texlive-langextra-doc
texlive-langgreek-doc
texlive-latex3-doc
texlive-latexextra-doc
texlive-music-doc
texlive-pictures-doc
texlive-plainextra-doc
texlive-pstricks-doc
texlive-publishers-doc
texlive-science-doc
thunderbird-spell-i18n
<snip>
These are PKGBUILD errors. Additionally, it looks like someone has
someone = me :)
see further below
removed old verisons as only the latest seem to exist here:
ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/other/texlive/
Please take this up with the individual maintainers or file a bug
report or something
I don't know about the texlive-*-doc packages from community, which are
maintained by Stefan Hussman. Feel free to ask him directly or to file a
bug report.
In the case of the texlive packages in extra, I always upload the
sources to ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/other/texlive/ and usually leave the
source tarball for at least the last two versions. It does happen that I
forget, however, and Eric usually reminds me quickly ;)
I think keeping the tarballs for the last two versions is sane, but if
someone thinks otherwise, I can leave them available for a longer
period. Opinion on this?
Now, more spefically:
* texlive-core : sources are up-to-date, so probably your ABS tree was
not in sync.
* texlive-bibtexextra : the latest source tarball was indeed missing,
fixed now!
It's also possible that the -doc packages are farther behind, and
sources have been removed for those simply because they're not up to
speed with the official texlive packages
Hello,
the -doc packages are far behind because I did not manage to build them correctly,
i.e to download the doc packages in a similar way Firmicus does for the normal
packages. I did not upload the zip-files to ftp.archlinux.org because I do not
see a reason for doing so and the packages are quite big. No user probably wants
to update a the packages that way or will be able to do so.
Regards Stefan Husmann
