Aaron Griffin a écrit : > 2009/10/5 Sergej Pupykin <pupykin.s@xxxxxxxxx>: > >> Btw, if someone interested in, here is the list of packages which failed >> last time: >> <snip> >> texlive-bibtexextra >> texlive-bibtexextra-doc >> texlive-core >> texlive-core-doc >> texlive-fontsextra-doc >> texlive-formatsextra-doc >> texlive-games-doc >> texlive-genericextra-doc >> texlive-htmlxml-doc >> texlive-humanities-doc >> texlive-langcjk-doc >> texlive-langcyrillic-doc >> texlive-langextra-doc >> texlive-langgreek-doc >> texlive-latex3-doc >> texlive-latexextra-doc >> texlive-music-doc >> texlive-pictures-doc >> texlive-plainextra-doc >> texlive-pstricks-doc >> texlive-publishers-doc >> texlive-science-doc >> thunderbird-spell-i18n >> <snip> > These are PKGBUILD errors. Additionally, it looks like someone has > someone = me :) see further below > removed old verisons as only the latest seem to exist here: > ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/other/texlive/ > > Please take this up with the individual maintainers or file a bug > report or something > > I don't know about the texlive-*-doc packages from community, which are maintained by Stefan Hussman. Feel free to ask him directly or to file a bug report. In the case of the texlive packages in extra, I always upload the sources to ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/other/texlive/ and usually leave the source tarball for at least the last two versions. It does happen that I forget, however, and Eric usually reminds me quickly ;) I think keeping the tarballs for the last two versions is sane, but if someone thinks otherwise, I can leave them available for a longer period. Opinion on this? Now, more spefically: * texlive-core : sources are up-to-date, so probably your ABS tree was not in sync. * texlive-bibtexextra : the latest source tarball was indeed missing, fixed now! Thanks, F
