On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:22:12 -0600 Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Back on topic: > One user talking on an ML does not make a package important. I have > not yet run into a site that requires moonlight/silverlight. So, until > we're actually going to get usage out of this package, putting it in > extra is wasted effort. Now, if we have a dev willing to do it, that's > fine - I'd recommend asking the mono maintainer or something of the > sort. But considering it's not in the repos yet, I don't think we have > any devs that care that much. Ok, after all this discussion on this topic, I think I can manage the moonlight package. I will have a look into the moonlight package. I will open a new thread about this later on the public-dev-mailinglist, if it's necessary to discuss further things. moonlight isn't a big package and it belongs (more or less) to mono, so I can handle it together with mono. > The proper course for things of this nature is to put it in the AUR, > and we can garner some need from that. > > Cheers, > Aaron Cheers, Daniel
