Re: Moonlight 1.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Amanai <amanai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I gotta say, even with all the usual MS distrust that I've been
>> carrying around since MS-DOS 3.x, on the surface Moonlight looks much
>> more promising than the clusterfsck that is Flash. I'd be interested
>> in at least giving it a shot.
>>
>> --vk
>>
>
> This sounds mutch better,
>

Funny you say that... Looking over the Moonlight homepage, there is
the Microsoft covenant for not sueing who uses it. The first paragraph
is very "interesting":

http://www.microsoft.com/interop/msnovellcollab/moonlight.mspx

Basically, they agree not to sue you (the Moonlight users), just if
you use a copy of the implementation only as a plugin and the copy
must be made between the period of validity of the covenant. In other
words, they can pull the plug on that and can sue everyone they want.
I hardly think this is a good thing, even though the pure techonogy is
better by now.

-- 
-------------------------------------------
Denis A. Altoe Falqueto
-------------------------------------------
George Burns  - "You can't help getting older, but you don't have to get old."


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux