On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:39:40 -0800, stefan-husmann@xxxxxxxxxxx
<stefan-husmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,
I agree perfectly. But it would be the correct way to handle things
like that, and would put some noise away from this list.
BTW, the new rules for the TUs would even forbid to put it to
community without discussion. The devs might have some similar rules for
putting something new to extra.
Regards Stefan
New rules? The voting never worked and will never working!
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:18:59 -0800, Aaron Griffin
<aaronmgriffin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Agreed. We're not in the habit of adding packages to extra simply
because of one noisy user. We need to ensure people will actually use
it so we're not wasting our time.
It was just one question if "moonlight" will pe a part of Archlinux and
you call me "noisy user"! You must be a typical american overweight kid to
say this! Did I wake you up in your dreamworld?
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:14:49 -0800, Vesa Kaihlavirta <vpkaihla@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I gotta say, even with all the usual MS distrust that I've been
carrying around since MS-DOS 3.x, on the surface Moonlight looks much
more promising than the clusterfsck that is Flash. I'd be interested
in at least giving it a shot.
--vk
This sounds mutch better,
