-----Original Message----- > Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:09:44 +0100 > Subject: Re: [arch-general] Moonlight 1.0 > From: Amanai <amanai@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "General Discusson about Arch Linux" <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:39:40 -0800, stefan-husmann@xxxxxxxxxxx > <stefan-husmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I agree perfectly. But it would be the correct way to handle things > > like that, and would put some noise away from this list. > > > > BTW, the new rules for the TUs would even forbid to put it to > > community without discussion. The devs might have some similar rules > > for putting something new to extra. > > > > Regards Stefan > > > > > > New rules? The voting never worked and will never working! > > > On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:18:59 -0800, Aaron Griffin > <aaronmgriffin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Agreed. We're not in the habit of adding packages to extra simply > > because of one noisy user. We need to ensure people will actually > > use it so we're not wasting our time. > > > > > > It was just one question if "moonlight" will pe a part of Archlinux > and you call me "noisy user"! You must be a typical american > overweight kid to say this! Did I wake you up in your dreamworld? > > > On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:14:49 -0800, Vesa Kaihlavirta > <vpkaihla@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > I gotta say, even with all the usual MS distrust that I've been > > carrying around since MS-DOS 3.x, on the surface Moonlight looks > > much more promising than the clusterfsck that is Flash. I'd be > > interested in at least giving it a shot. > > > > --vk > > > > > > This sounds mutch better, > > They may work or not, rules are rules.
