Dear William On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:36 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wrowe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2/10/2011 2:48 AM, Zeno Davatz wrote: >> >> It seems that Apache for Windows interprets vhosts.conf files >> differently then Apache for Linux does. I am asking this question >> related to mod_ruby. Both Apaches (Linux and Windows) start fine with >> mod_ruby.so loaded. > > httpd does not. In fact the entire codebase of httpd is identical except > in respect to splitting off and dispatching to worker processes (that lies > in the MPM, winnt has its own), and handling owner/group sids (which only > unix really looks at relative to suexec features), and mod_win32's special > handling of cgi's. The rest? Identical. The consistency comes from APR's > portability layer. > > I see you spent a bunch of time on the dev@ list today debugging mod_ruby, > please stop doing that. users@ may be a good place to start your research, > but ultimately these questions have to go to the mod_ruby people to tell > you what is broken. mod_ruby is not an ASF project. What has to happen that this becomes an ASF project? My goal is that mod_ruby becomes a standard Apache library. > If you want to fix modules, we encourage developers/hackers to join the > modules-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx list, where all sorts of questions about what > bubble gum and bailing wire to use in third party modules are encouraged. Ok, I will head over there then. Thanks for the hint. Best Zeno --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|