On 2/10/2011 2:48 AM, Zeno Davatz wrote: > > It seems that Apache for Windows interprets vhosts.conf files > differently then Apache for Linux does. I am asking this question > related to mod_ruby. Both Apaches (Linux and Windows) start fine with > mod_ruby.so loaded. httpd does not. In fact the entire codebase of httpd is identical except in respect to splitting off and dispatching to worker processes (that lies in the MPM, winnt has its own), and handling owner/group sids (which only unix really looks at relative to suexec features), and mod_win32's special handling of cgi's. The rest? Identical. The consistency comes from APR's portability layer. I see you spent a bunch of time on the dev@ list today debugging mod_ruby, please stop doing that. users@ may be a good place to start your research, but ultimately these questions have to go to the mod_ruby people to tell you what is broken. mod_ruby is not an ASF project. If you want to fix modules, we encourage developers/hackers to join the modules-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx list, where all sorts of questions about what bubble gum and bailing wire to use in third party modules are encouraged. Yours, Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|