Rich Bowen <rbowen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Apr 14, 2009, at 06:19, Viaduct Productions wrote: > > > Or would you rather me ask a question that doesn't shed light on issues? > > Kind of like "only behave the way we wish"? Then why have a list? You > > want approval? Get a dog. I'm here because things are not clear. Yes, > > it's a list for users. Users are not developers, hence the difference > > in lists. Hence the need for documentation, to take users into a space > > for having the need for such lists. Pretty simple, don't you think? > > Most areas where you offer a service, you minimize things so that they > > are not misleading, as they apparently are here. See the example above. > > > > I have little patience for you. I'm sure the above information is > > completely OK by you, but that would only shed light on the real issue > > of most open source software, which is accompanied by questionable > > technically written documentation. So yes, the documentation is > > horribly written. If you can find 2.2 documentation that sheds light on > > this, which I've spent the better part of 2 days reading, then please > > point it out. Documentation is about understanding, which it has not > > provided. So yes, it goes into the bug reporting system as a bug, as > > it's not performing as expected, as defined by the docs. If it found > > that the performance is as expected by the developers, yet the > > documentation doesn't provide insight, then the documentation needs to > > be fixed. That, is as much a part of apache as the server itself. > > > > And be nice. > > I've been around this mailing list for a long time. I'd guess 12 years, at > the very least. It's not often that we get postings from anybody as > utterly rude and unprofessional as this. Had this been a commercial > technical support encounter, this would be the point at which I would have > hung up. > > There is never any excuse to be this rude, particularly in a public forum, > where it is archived forever. > > You posted a question, posted a solution that had nothing whatever to do > with your question, and then posted this diatribe, which had nothing to do > with either one, and then have the audacity to claim that we do what we do > in order to get your approval. > > One hopes that at some point you have the grace to look back on this > exchange and be embarrassed at your behavior. > > -- http://feathercast.org/ > Up to now i have only been lurking on this list, but I second the above with all of my hart. I admire you guys beeing able to go on advising this troll. -- Roel Wagenaar, Timmerman-aannemer, Tel.: 0513-789900. Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|