I've plugged in disk_cache instead of mem_cache, and it's caching properly. So I'm going to go ahead and raise a bug report, as you suggest. Thanks Mike -----Original Message----- From: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV [mailto:Axel-Stephane.SMORGRAV@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: 31 May 2006 15:10 To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [users@httpd] Reverse Proxy Cache not Caching in 2.2.2 Well, the second response is definitively not served from cache (nor the first one for that matter). The cache provider definitively tries to store the response (measning that there is nothing in the headers preventing the response from being cached) in both cases and declines to serve the response in both cases. I have no idea what the problem might be, and I absolutely do not know how to debug it. Had the cache provider been disk_cache I would have said you should check whether the cache root directory and there were cache files at the leafs (at least Apache 2.0 did not complain about that, might be the same in Apache 2.2) In your place I would probably mem_cache by disk_cache to see if it behaved as expected (serves responses from cache the second time around and creates the cache files under the cache dir). If so, I would file a bug report on mem_cache... Maybe Rüdiger has a clue. -ascs ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs service. ________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|