Re: [users@httpd] mod_cache broken in 2.2.0 ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/9/05, Dick Snippe <Dick.Snippe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> we use apache-2.0.x as a reverse caching proxy, using mod_cache,
> mod_mem_cache, mod_proxy and mod_proxy_http.

It wouldn't surprise me terribly if mod_mem_cache was broken in 2.2. 
It has received much less TLC than mod_disk_cache.  Given the lack of
response here, you should probably file a bug report.

Under many circumstances (especially on an OS with an efficient
sendfile syscall) you'll find that mod_disk_cache will be faster
anyway, since it passes much of the memory management job on to the OS
where it can be handled more efficiently.  So one option would be to
move to mod_disk_cache.

Joshua.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux