Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.0.53 not responding on a 64-bit Windows 2003 Itanium machine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 6 May 2005, Harish Sundaram wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I'd like to elaborate on the problem faced by Santosh and myself......
> 
> We ported the Apache 2.0.53 source code to make it work fine on Win2K3
> Itanium Machine. After successfully compiling and installing Apache, we
> started the apache service using:
> ***********************************************
> apache\bin$$   apache -k install
> apache\bin$$   apache -k start
> ***********************************************
> 
> This started Apache Service successfully. The error log had the following
> entries:
> ***********************************************
> [Fri May 06 10:01:25 2005] [notice] Apache/2.0.53 (Win32) DAV/2
> configured -- resuming normal operations
> [Fri May 06 10:01:25 2005] [notice] Server built: May  5 2005 10:06:43
> [Fri May 06 10:01:25 2005] [notice] Parent: Created child process 2824
> [Fri May 06 10:01:25 2005] [notice] Child 2824: Child process is running
> [Fri May 06 10:01:25 2005] [notice] Child 2824: Acquired the start mutex.
> [Fri May 06 10:01:25 2005] [notice] Child 2824: Starting 250 worker threads.
> ************************************************
> The httpd.pid file also got created with the pid.
> Also, using Start->Programs->Administrative Tools->Service, I checked out
> that the Apache Service was up and running.
> 
> Now, we tried to access the default page using IE on the same Win2K3
> machine.
> http://localhost:8092/
> and also using:
> http://172.26.12.56:8092/
> After hitting enter, the browser thinks about this for an eternity and then
> displays an error page saying that the Server cannot be reached.
> The Apache Server access log remains empty i.e. no entry is made in it. No
> additions are made to the error log.
> Does this mean that although apache is running, we are not able to reach it?
> What could be the reason for this? Is there some network related setting
> required?
> 
> We also tried using telnet...
> GET http://localhost:8092/ HTTP/1.1
> HOST: mypc
> Even using telnet, no response is obtained.
> 
> Need some help on this......
> 
> Thanks and Regards,
> Harish.
> 
> 
> 
> http://www.patni.com
> World-Wide Partnerships. World-Class Solutions.
> 

Simple stuff first, no insult intended.  Are you sure Apache is configured
for port 8092?  Does netstat show you that it is indeed listening on 8092?  
If so, no response (and no log from Apache) suggests firewall issues.  
I'm not sure about the MS TCP stack, but normally calls to localhost
circumvent the stack, so networking issues are unlikely.  Is there a host
firewall on this machine blocking port 8092?  Is there some other security
software that may be preventing the browser from opening an outgoing port?

-- 
Craig Dunigan
IS Technical Services Specialist (I don't know what it means, either)
Middleware - Enterprise Info Systems - Department of Info Technology
University of Wisconsin, Madison

opinions expressed are my own, not the University's


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux