I'm getting this in the error log:[Thu May 05 11:42:29 2005] [warn] child process 1874 still did not exit, sending a SIGTERM [Thu May 05 11:42:29 2005] [warn] child process 1672 still did not exit, sending a SIGTERM [Thu May 05 11:42:29 2005] [warn] child process 1875 still did not exit, sending a SIGTERM [Thu May 05 11:42:29 2005] [warn] child process 1886 still did not exit, sending a SIGTERM [Thu May 05 11:42:29 2005] [warn] child process 1857 still did not exit, sending a SIGTERM [Thu May 05 11:42:29 2005] [warn] child process 1858 still did not exit, sending a SIGTERM [Thu May 05 11:42:29 2005] [warn] child process 1864 still did not exit, sending a SIGTERM
[Thu May 05 11:42:30 2005] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down[Thu May 05 11:52:23 2005] [notice] Digest: generating secret for digest authentication ...
[Thu May 05 11:52:23 2005] [notice] Digest: doneThis is Redhat 9.0. <hiding face> Unfortunately, I know just enough about Linux to get things running. I've never had to deal with an issue like this. So I am clueless in figuring out what kinda traffic is happening, etc. It FEELS like the traffic is outgoing though. If it were incoming traffic, the traffic would still be coming in wouldn't it? I mean if you go to the url in question, it currently loads the main website instead. So that traffic would be the same.
ANY pointers to information about tracking traffic, etc would be helpful. I'd like to learn from this mess.
Thank you for your understanding and time. John Hudak wrote:
Hi Carl:I can't provide a specific answer to your problems but I can ask some questions that may help you muddle thorough this. I am thinking this may be a resource contention problem on your machine that ultimately manifests itself as slow network traffic. I am assuming that when you are looking at network traffic the traffic is about the same on the 4 server version versus the 5 server version? So, what OS are you using this under? If Linux, have you seen your process stack grow? doing a lot of disk swapping? Have you tuned the packet length processing - from what I recall, Windoz is more sensitive to this than Linux. These are just some things to think about...perhaps they can highlight an area to look more into.John Carl Schrader wrote:I have Apache 2.0 with 5 virtual servers set up. As of a couple days ago, our network has been REAL slow. Today I tracked it back to Apache and specifically this one virtual server. If I turn off this virtual server, the network comes back to normal. I've looked at the logs and don't see anything out of the ordinary.Where should I start to track this down? thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx--------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- Life's too short for FM. Get XM! Get Firefox! http://spreadfirefox.com/community/?q=affiliates&id=1312&t=1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|