Re: Balancer logic on a per-context basis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/31/2012 1:40 PM, kharper2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I am using AJP exclusively to the balancer-members.  Forgive my
> ignorance... but will apache still take action if a "failonstatus" is set
> (for example, to 503) if AJP is the communication medium to the
> balancer-member?  I assume apache can deduce the HTTP status code
> regardless of the protocol used to the back-end server, but I dislike
> assumptions. :)

I think that should be fine but have never tested it myself. When I
wrote the patch, my testing was all over http - I don't recall adding
any protocol specific logic. Please do report back if you come across
any complications.

-- 
Daniel Ruggeri


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux