Hello Daniel, > There is a failonstatus parameter you can set for each > balancer member that will have mod_proxy_balancer mark the worker out of > service if that status code is found I noticed that parameter and had considered it, but wasn't sure how apache would know to re-enable it. Thank you for clearing that up. I am using AJP exclusively to the balancer-members. Forgive my ignorance... but will apache still take action if a "failonstatus" is set (for example, to 503) if AJP is the communication medium to the balancer-member? I assume apache can deduce the HTTP status code regardless of the protocol used to the back-end server, but I dislike assumptions. :) Thanks. Kyle Harper This communication and any attachments are confidential, protected by Communications Privacy Act 18 USCS § 2510, solely for the use of the intended recipient, and may contain legally privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please return or destroy it immediately. Thank you. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|