On Mar 13, 2012, at 1:25 PM, Tom Evans wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:19 PM, William Taylor <williamt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I wouldn't say it's silly, but definitely not the norm and obviously a >> low priority >> for everyone else. > > I would say that forking an entire new process to handle a single > request and then exiting could possibly be the most silly way to serve > http. > Ahhhh... ServerType inetd memories :) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|