On 2022-06-14 04:57, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On 2022-06-13 19:55, Harry Wentland wrote: >> This seems to be a case of a Windows-centric commit description that doesn't >> completely make sense for Linux. >> >> The code-change doesn't currently affect any behavior on Linux. It just lays >> the groundwork in DC to allow an implementation to do a memory-clock switching >> decision based around VRR support. >> >> In short, this won't be a problem for us at this point. > > Thanks for the clarification. > No problem. Thanks for your review and for voicing your concern when something doesn't look right. Harry >
