On 2018-08-23 08:38 AM, Deucher, Alexander wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> >> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 3:01 AM >> To: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay at gmail.com>; Dave Airlie >> <airlied at redhat.com> >> Cc: Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher at amd.com>; Kuehling, Felix >> <Felix.Kuehling at amd.com>; amd-gfx list <amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org> >> Subject: Re: KFD co-maintainership and branch model >> >> Am 23.08.2018 um 08:54 schrieb Oded Gabbay: >>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 4:34 AM David Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Felix Kuehling >> <felix.kuehling at amd.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Oded has offered to make me co-maintainer of KFD, as he's super busy >>>>> at work and less responsive than he used to be. >>>>> >>>>> At the same time we're about to send out the first patches to merge >>>>> KFD and AMDGPU into a single kernel module. >>>>> >>>>> With that in mind I'd like to propose to upstream KFD through Alex's >>>>> branch in the future. It would avoid conflicts in shared code >>>>> (amdgpu_vm.c is most active at the moment) when merging branches, >>>>> and make the code flow and testing easier. >>>>> >>>>> Please let me know what you think? >>>>> >>>> Works for me. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Dave. >>> Works for me as well. >> Sounds good to me as well. > Works for me as well. Thank you. We have agreement. Right now KFD in amd-staging-drm-next is a bit behind what's drm-next. Alex, are you planning to rebase amd-staging-drm-next soon? If not, I'd like to cherry-pick the missing commits before applying anything new. Regards,  Felix > > Alex > >> Christian. >> >>> Oded >>> _______________________________________________ >>> amd-gfx mailing list >>> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org >>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
