KFD co-maintainership and branch model

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

Oded has offered to make me co-maintainer of KFD, as he's super busy at
work and less responsive than he used to be.

At the same time we're about to send out the first patches to merge KFD
and AMDGPU into a single kernel module.

With that in mind I'd like to propose to upstream KFD through Alex's
branch in the future. It would avoid conflicts in shared code
(amdgpu_vm.c is most active at the moment) when merging branches, and
make the code flow and testing easier.

Please let me know what you think?

Regards,
  Felix

-- 
F e l i x   K u e h l i n g
PMTS Software Development Engineer | Linux Compute Kernel
1 Commerce Valley Dr. East, Markham, ON L3T 7X6 Canada
(O) +1(289)695-1597
   _     _   _   _____   _____
  / \   | \ / | |  _  \  \ _  |
 / A \  | \M/ | | |D) )  /|_| |
/_/ \_\ |_| |_| |_____/ |__/ \|   facebook.com/AMD | amd.com



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux