> -----Original Message----- > From: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 3:01 AM > To: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay at gmail.com>; Dave Airlie > <airlied at redhat.com> > Cc: Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher at amd.com>; Kuehling, Felix > <Felix.Kuehling at amd.com>; amd-gfx list <amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org> > Subject: Re: KFD co-maintainership and branch model > > Am 23.08.2018 um 08:54 schrieb Oded Gabbay: > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 4:34 AM David Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Felix Kuehling > <felix.kuehling at amd.com> wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Oded has offered to make me co-maintainer of KFD, as he's super busy > >>> at work and less responsive than he used to be. > >>> > >>> At the same time we're about to send out the first patches to merge > >>> KFD and AMDGPU into a single kernel module. > >>> > >>> With that in mind I'd like to propose to upstream KFD through Alex's > >>> branch in the future. It would avoid conflicts in shared code > >>> (amdgpu_vm.c is most active at the moment) when merging branches, > >>> and make the code flow and testing easier. > >>> > >>> Please let me know what you think? > >>> > >> Works for me. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Dave. > > Works for me as well. > > Sounds good to me as well. Works for me as well. Alex > > Christian. > > > > > Oded > > _______________________________________________ > > amd-gfx mailing list > > amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
