[PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: export test ring debugfs interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2017å¹´05æ??11æ?¥ 11:03, Huang Rui wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:50:17AM +0800, Zhou, David(ChunMing) wrote:
>>
>> On 2017å¹´05æ??11æ?¥ 10:41, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
>>
>>      > -----Original Message-----
>>      > From: Deucher, Alexander
>>      > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 10:38 PM
>>      > To: Huang, Ray; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; Koenig, Christian
>>      > Cc: Zhou, David(ChunMing); Wang, Ken; Huan, Alvin; Huang, Ray
>>      > Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: export test ring debugfs interface
>>      >
>>      > > -----Original Message-----
>>      > > From: Huang Rui [mailto:ray.huang at amd.com]
>>      > > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 10:29 PM
>>      > > To: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; Deucher, Alexander; Koenig,
>>      Christian
>>      > > Cc: Zhou, David(ChunMing); Wang, Ken; Huan, Alvin; Huang, Ray
>>      > > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: export test ring debugfs interface
>>      > >
>>      > > Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang at amd.com>
>>      >
>>      > Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
>>
>>      Not sure if it's important for this since it's debugfs, but we don't have
>>      any sort of ring locks anymore (since everything should go through the
>>      scheduler once it's started) so we could theoretically get collisions if
>>      there are active apps using the GPU and you run these tests.
>>
>> Yes, agree. So patch#1 for ib test should use scheduler, but which could be a
>> big change and Christian doesn't like to use scheduler for ib test case,
>> consider this is only for test case, the problem isn't big:).
> Do you know any method to hold on the scheduler?
like Alex suggested, park scheduler, and then do your things.

Regards,
David Zhou
>
>> btw: I think patch#2 isn't need if patch#1 is landed, since when you use this
>> sys interface, the amdgpu driver must be loaded successfully, ring test is
>> meaningless.
>>
> In normal case, ring tests&ib tests must be passed during boot&resume&reset
> phase. Is there anything that will break the ring test at runtime?
>
> Thanks,
> Rui



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux