On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 04:33:08PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 14:11 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 06:11:12PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > Well, that's what the commit ddc9e69b9dc2 does after all: it cleans > > > up > > > the legacy usage, and moves all either OF or ACPI matching. > > Which is broken since not all the world is ACPI or DT. > While I agree on the second part, I don't think it's broken per se, > there never was a single user of that, and looking how ASoC board files > are organized it is quite unlikely there will be one... I have no idea why you say the ASoC machine drivers would prevent someone adding a platform based user, obviously ASoC predates the use of both ACPI and DT quite considerably. > > That's what I said, yes. > ...though we can (re)introduce this dead code back for a potential user > in the future. The IDs are back as a result of the merge resolution I did.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
